Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Administrator, Curator, or StaffDiana Hamilton Date: May 27, 2005 8:29am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: Why arent Hendrix and Marley in the archive

Fan trading is not necessarily the same as public, longterm archiving here, even though both are in the same spirit. Some artists say Yes to the one but No to the other (example: Phish). That's why we want to hear an OK on the archiving concept.

Glenn, if you can point me to an OK for the LMA idea by a valid Hendrix rep even if from 2 years ago, I can attempt a followup. Thanks!

This post was modified by Diana Hamilton on 2005-05-27 15:29:43

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: theGreenManalishi Date: Jun 3, 2005 3:42am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: Why arent Hendrix and Marley in the archive

with hendix...it's greedy family members. them folks is milkin' the old shows fo' all they be worth. 40 years later too...kinda funny that none of them has done anything in their own lives in that time, to capitalize on. maybe extreme acid abuse does effect/affect/afflict the gene pool.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Administrator, Curator, or StaffDiana Hamilton Date: Jun 3, 2005 6:25am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: Why arent Hendrix and Marley in the archive

Um, I don't think posts in this vein would help toward a future thumbs up...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: glenn Date: Jun 3, 2005 9:14am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: Why arent Hendrix and Marley in the archive

"Fan trading is not necessarily the same as public, longterm archiving here, even though both are in the same spirit."

I'll see if I can point you to a source for the permission, at any rate, I don't believe they gave permission for etrading, but allowed free trading of tapes from live shows only. I think things like the apartment sessions weren't included either.

Diane, if I can find the info, I'll pass it along. It may yet be possible. I haven't seen any evidence of greed or selfishness on the part of Jimi's family, and they may well be open, at this point, or in the future, to including Jimi in the archive.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: theGreenManalishi Date: Jun 3, 2005 10:59am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: Why arent Hendrix and Marley in the archive

uh oh...am i on the sh!t list???
i'll be more careful as to voicing my opinions/thoughts in the future.
what gave me the clue was the 20 or 30 releases by the family in the past few years...but then again...i could be wrong. this is a forum...right?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Administrator, Curator, or StaffDiana Hamilton Date: Jun 4, 2005 1:43am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: Why arent Hendrix and Marley in the archive

this is a forum...right?

Successful communication is all about the diplomacy though, right? ;)

Thanks to glenn's memories, found this exchange:
http://furthurnet.org/bandlist/bands_rec_info.php?rec_type=audio_info&id=237
which seems to illuminate the estate's understanding and generosity toward fans.

This post was modified by Diana Hamilton on 2005-06-04 08:43:30

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: glenn Date: Jul 4, 2005 6:06pm
Forum: etree Subject: Re: Why arent Hendrix and Marley in the archive

That's the post I was thinking of. Diane, thanks for digging that out... I tried all night looking for that.